Canadian Indemnity Co. v. State Automobile Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Although DirecTV’s claims against defendants arise out of the same statute, the same transaction requirement was not met, because “each transaction represents a separate and independent act, [as] no defendant knew of the other’s transactions or purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).