District Court of Appeal of Florida· 4/4/1962
Canada v. State
Citations
- 139 So. 2d 753
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- omission of intent to deprive element from cattle stealing instruction; “the defense ... was . .. that [the defendant] had no intention of stealing the cattle, but that his actions were the result of instructions received from the agent of the owner.. .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shannon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-10-28· cited 61×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-06-30· cited 55×
- Robles v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1966-07-08· cited 48×
- Koontz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-11-15· cited 29×
- Reid v. Florida Real Estate CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-07-22· cited 23×
- Laythe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-04-06· cited 16×
- American Fire & Cas. Co. v. Sunny South Aircraft Serv., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 1963-03-13· cited 14×
- Waters v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-07-31· cited 10×
- Gellman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-05-15· cited 8×
- Austin v. WainwrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-01-10· cited 6×
- Simpkin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-10-10· cited 6×
- Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-07-07· cited 6×
- Dawson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-24· cited 1×
- Angell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-08-06
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.