Skip to main content
· 10/12/2004

Cañada v. Hernández

Citations

  • 340 F. Supp. 2d 142
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20621

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When the doctrine of complete preemption does not apply, but the plaintiff's claim is still arguably preempted under § 514(a), the district court, being without removal jurisdiction, must remand to the state court where the preemption issue can be addressed and resolved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gelpí

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.