Canabal v. Aramark Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding that neither Law 17 nor Law 100 allow individual liability
• “nothing in Law 17 leads the Court to conclude that sexual harassment was to be singled out as the only form of employment discrimination, including other forms of sex discrimination, for which supervisors or agents could be individually liable”
• “Had Congress intended to hold individuals liable, it would have addressed the actions and conditions that would subject them to liability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).