Can v. United States of America Drug Enforcement Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a Section 983(e) motion, in the alternative, where “[the plaintiff] himself knew of the seizure [by local officers] and the DEA’s .involvement in it”
• finding the plaintiff’s 11 The DEA had a statutory obligation to notify Plaintiff of the impending forfeiture. See 19 U.S.C. § 1607(a
• \failure to bring [an] action within the statute of limitations provides a basis for dismissal of the complaint upon that ground alone.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).