· 1/29/1923
Campsie v. Catton, Neill & Co.
Citations
- 26 Haw. 737
- 1923 Haw. LEXIS 80
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Court denied VA motion to remand for statement of reasons or bases when BVA readjudication could not change the outcome
- Court denied Secretary’s motion for remand to allow BVA to determine if evidence was new and material
- lay statements from acquaintances were cumulative of earlier letters and, therefore, not new
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lindsay, Perry, Peters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.