Skip to main content
· 1/29/1923

Campsie v. Catton, Neill & Co.

Citations

  • 26 Haw. 737
  • 1923 Haw. LEXIS 80

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Court denied VA motion to remand for statement of reasons or bases when BVA readjudication could not change the outcome
  • Court denied Secretary’s motion for remand to allow BVA to determine if evidence was new and material
  • lay statements from acquaintances were cumulative of earlier letters and, therefore, not new

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lindsay, Perry, Peters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.