Campos v. General Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the pleaded allegations must be taken as true when deciding what theory a complaint sounded in for purposes of deciding whether it was time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations
• stating that the pleaded allegations must be taken as true when deciding what theory a complaint sounded in for purposes of deciding whether it was time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations
• “Only those allegations which charge an intentional interference with plaintiff’s own mental well-being, as distinguished from other’s reactions to the charges, are not barred by the one-year statute of limitations of M.C.L.A. s 600.5805(6).”
• “The same conduct, falsely accusing another of crime, may give rise to two causes of action [one being slander and the other intentional infliction of mental distress] depending on the interest which was injured.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).