Campos v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[a] full range of medium work 24 ||requires standing or walking, off and on, for a total of 25 ||lapproximately 6 hours in an 8-hour workday” (citing SSR 83-10)
• finding 13 that plaintiff’s speculation that her obesity might have had an impact “does not constitute 14 evidence and falls short of meeting her burden of proof”
• finding 8 no error where plaintiff “failed . . . to point to any evidence that she suffered from 9 functional limitations due to [her impairment], let alone limitations which would 10 have impacted the ALJ’s analysis”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).