Campo v. Henry's Drive-In of Illinois

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellant’s failure to develop an argument in support of his claim, or provide pertinent citation to authority rendered his claim waived
• finding that claim is waived where Appellant fails to develop an argument in support of this claim, or to provide pertinent citation to authority.
• stating that the “party who asserts a trial judge must be disqualified bears the burden of producing evidence establishing bias, prejudice, or unfairness necessitating recusal[.]”
• noting it is not the responsibility of this Court to scour the record to find evidence to support an argument
• it is not the responsibility of this Court to scour the record to find evidence to support an argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).