Camphor v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding following jury instruction: “Should you find the defendant not guilty of the crime of burglary, you would be authorized to consider under the evidence whether or not he did, at said time and place, commit the lesser offense of criminal trespass”
• “Should you find the defendant not guilty of the crime of burglary, you would be authorized to consider under the evidence whether or not he did, at said time and place, commit the lesser offense of criminal trespass”
• no reversible error where the trial court instructed the jury, “Should you find the defendant not guilty of the crime of burglary, you would be authorized to consider under the evidence whether or not he did . . . commit the 12 lesser offense of criminal trespass.”
• no error where trial court charged the jury, “Should you find the defendant not guilty of the crime of burglary, you would be authorized to consider under the evidence whether or not he did, at said time and place, commit the lesser offense of criminal trespass”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).