Campe v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, “[w]hen the Supreme Court is splintered” and no plurality or concurring opinion is “a logical subset of” another, “the only binding aspect of the decision is its specific result”
• “[D]iminution of privacy and a violation of the right to exclude [are] legally cognizable harms.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).