Campbellsville Tel. Co. v. Patteson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• overstaffing matter by using six attorneys and three paralegals and duplication of work merited reduction
• applying Virginia law to determine pre-judgment interest in a diversity case
• “Well-established Maryland law provides. . . that parties to a contract may agree to the law which will govern their transaction[.]” (citation 3 Defendant also suggested that Plaintiff waived this argument through his conduct. (ECF No. 58, at 15
• citations omitted}. Here, as there is no allegation that the parties entered into a contract, let alone included a choice of law clause in a contract, the Court applies Maryland law. hy TA . . defendant.” RRC Ne., LLC.v. BAA Maryland, Inc., 994 A,2d 430, 442 (Md. 2010

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).