Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1/6/1998

Campbell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Citations

705 A.2d 503
1998 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 9

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that termination was improper where employer’s expert did not rebut the claimant’s credible complaints of ongoing pain and fatigue
holding that termination was improper where the employer’s expert did not rebut the claimant’s credible complaints of ongoing pain and fatigue
holding that termination was improper where the employer’s expert did not rebut the claimant’s credible complaints of ongoing pain and fatigue
holding that termination was improper where the employer’s expert did not rebut the claimant’s credible complaints of ongoing pain and fatigue
holding that termination was improper where the employer’s expert did not rebut the claimant’s credible complaints of ongoing pain and fatigue
where the burdened party presents sufficient evidence as a matter of law we must examine the basis for the adverse ruling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colins, Friedman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Campbell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.