Campbell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that termination was improper where employer’s expert did not rebut the claimant’s credible complaints of ongoing pain and fatigue
• holding that termination was improper where the employer’s expert did not rebut the claimant’s credible complaints of ongoing pain and fatigue
• holding that termination was improper where the employer’s expert did not rebut the claimant’s credible complaints of ongoing pain and fatigue
• holding that termination was improper where the employer’s expert did not rebut the claimant’s credible complaints of ongoing pain and fatigue
• holding that termination was improper where the employer’s expert did not rebut the claimant’s credible complaints of ongoing pain and fatigue
• where the burdened party presents sufficient evidence as a matter of law we must examine the basis for the adverse ruling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).