Campbell v. United States Office of Personnel Management

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that OPM guidelines are not controlling and merely provide an overview of the OPM’s regulations for the internal appeals process
• rejecting claim that OPM’s decision not to cover surgical procedure was arbitrary and capricious where its decision “was based on a thorough review of [the plaintiffs] file and the recommendation of OPM’s own medical consultant’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).