Campbell v. Stone Ins., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that when the cover letter and flood rejection form acknowledged flood coverage exclusion, then the insured had constructive notice of the exclusion upon receiving those documents
• stating “The fact that the plaintiffs may have renewed the insurance policy each year does not restart the one-year peremptive period.”
• applying the standard for constructive knowledge outlined by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Campo to peremption pursuant to La. Rev. Stat. § 9:5606
• “Louisiana law imposes a duty on the insured to read and know his or her insurance policy provisions.”
• “The doctrine of improper joinder is a narrow exception to the rule of complete diversity[.]”
• “The doctrine of improper joinder is a narrow exception to the rule of complete diversity . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).