Supreme Court of Arkansas· 12/11/1989

Campbell v. State

Citations

781 S.W.2d 14
300 Ark. 570
10 A.L.R. 5th 931
1989 Ark. LEXIS 562

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that when the case involves the public interest, or tends to become moot before litigation can run its course, or a decision might avert future litigation, the supreme court has, with some regularity, refused to permit mootness to become the determinant
ousting county judge from office under art. 5, § 9, but stating that \if the judgment actually failed to impose a sentence . . . a different result might be required\
ousting county judge from office under art. 5, § 9, but stating that \if the judgment actually failed to impose a sentence . . . a different situation would be presented and a different result might be required\
ousting county judge from office under art. 5, § 9, but stating that \if the judgment actually failed to impose a sentence . . . a different situation would be presented and a different result might be required\
county judge subject to removal from office upon conviction of felony by lower court, and prior to exhaustion of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hays, Purtle, Newbern, Glaze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.