Texas Supreme Court· 8/29/2002
Campbell v. State
Citations
- 85 S.W.3d 176
- 45 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1251
- 2002 Tex. LEXIS 135
- 2002 WL 1981366
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that article 46.03, section 4(d)(5) hearing was required to be conducted pursuant to the Texas Mental Health Code
- “Accordingly, we conclude that only those Mental Health Code provisions pertinent to an article 46.03 section 4(d)(5) proceeding apply.”
- noting that a specific objection is one that enables the trial court to understand the precise grounds so as to make an informed ruling and that affords the offering party an opportunity to remedy any defect, if possible
- holding that article 46.03, section 4(d)(5
- disapproving of Lopez’s holding to the extent it could be construed as holding the State was not required to comply at all with the Mental Health Code’s provisions in article 46.03 hearings
- \Commitment to a mental hospital is a weighty curtailment of one's liberty. Such a restriction on liberty requires the protections afforded by due process.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Enoch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kerry Heckman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Williamson CountyTexas Supreme Court· 2012-06-08· cited 1,134×
- Arkoma Basin Exploration Co. v. FMF Associates 1990-A, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court· 2008-01-25· cited 284×
- Bic Pen Corp. v. Carter Ex Rel. CarterTexas Supreme Court· 2008-04-18· cited 48×
- Tryco Enterprises Inc., Sharon C. Dixon, James Dixon, Crown Staffing, Inc. and Troy Keith Dixon v. James A. RobinsonTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2012-09-13· cited 43×
- Exxon Corp. v. Makofski Ex Rel. MakofskiTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-10-23· cited 33×
- Freightliner Corp. v. Motor Vehicle Board of Texas Department of TransportationTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-05-01· cited 31×
- In Re F.M.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-12-22· cited 31×
- Campbell v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-07-31· cited 30×
- Long v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2004-03-09· cited 25×
- Evans v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2004-03-18· cited 25×
- In Re the Guardianship of KellerTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2005-07-27· cited 21×
- Dewhurst v. HendeeTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-04-23· cited 18×
- Candelario Marroquin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2003-07-31· cited 14×
- Laney v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2007-04-11· cited 13×
- Harrison v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2005-11-30· cited 11×
- Harrison v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2007-10-10· cited 7×
- Martin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2007-03-01· cited 6×
- Rodriquez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-05-02· cited 6×
- in the Interest of K. C.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2018-10-18· cited 4×
- In Re FMTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-12-22
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Trenholm v. RatcliffTexas Supreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 634×
- McDaniel v. YarbroughTexas Supreme Court· 1995-06-15· cited 161×
- Gulf Coast State Bank v. EmenhiserTexas Supreme Court· 1978-02-22· cited 71×
- State v. RolandTexas Supreme Court· 1998-08-25· cited 29×
- In the Best Interest & Protection of G.B.R.Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1997-07-31· cited 27×
- Campbell v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-10-04· cited 27×
- Coulson v. Lake LBJ Municipal Utility DistrictTexas Supreme Court· 1990-01-24· cited 22×
- Lopez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1989-08-23· cited 14×
- Weller v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1997-03-05· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.