Campbell v. Napier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Having amended his complaint twice in response to two previous motions to dismiss, Smith has had three opportunities to plead his claims, so dismissal of his federal claims with prejudice and without an opportunity to amend is warranted.”
• no reasonable inference of a “widespread practice” where plaintiff failed to allege even a second instance of wrongdoing against another employee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).