Campbell v. Masten

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff had conceded that summary judgment was appropriate on multiple claims when he “failed to respond to the arguments raised with respect to [those] claims in defendants’ memorandum in support of the motion for summary judgment”
• “The gravamen of any sexual harassment claim is that the alleged sexual advances were unwelcome.”
• “[The plaintiff] makes no claim that that situation was based on gender, rather than personal animosity.”
• employee who had consensual sexual relationship with her supervisor was fired because he saw her as a threat to his marriage
• “In order to advance a claim of sex/gender discrimination . . . a plaintiff must at least allege significant acts which, if proven, would demonstrate that the defendant . . . treated her in a disparate fashion on the basis of gender.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).