Campbell v. Kessler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a court \must interpret and construe a statute according to the precise language adopted by the legislature\
• noting that courts have no authority to interpret a statute in such a way as to extend its express terms or its reasonable and obvious implications
• finding that a court must construe a statute according to the precise language used by the legislature
• finding that a court \`must construe a statute according to the precise language used by the legislature'\ (quoting Fla. Gulf Health Sys. Agency Inc. v. Comm'n on Ethics, 354 So.2d 932, 933 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978))
• nothing courts are restricted to interpreting and constructing statutes, not in rewriting legislative language
• \When the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous it is not subject to judicial interpretation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).