Campbell v. Jones
Citations
- 73 Wash. 688
- 132 P. 635
- 1913 Wash. LEXIS 1661
Syllabus
<p>Tbial — Verdict—Special Eotdotos — Inconsistency. In an action for personal injuries caused by the negligence of defendant’s foreman in causing a rock to roll down a steep hillside, a special finding that the foreman’s stepping on the rock and causing it to roll was “purely accidental” is not so inconsistent with a general verdict for plaintiff as to control the judgment; since such inconsistency must be clear, and the definition of “accident” does not necessarily negative negligence; especially where the finding is largely a conclusion not necessarily called for by other special findings.</p>
Judges: Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GramesIndiana Supreme Court· 1893-09-21· cited 70×
- Campbell v. JonesWashington Supreme Court· 1910-10-03· cited 24×
- Walkup v. MayIndiana Court of Appeals· 1894-03-16· cited 16×
- Cameron v. Stack-Gibbs Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1912-05-25· cited 12×
- McCorkle v. MalloryWashington Supreme Court· 1903-01-07· cited 11×
- Gaudie v. Northern Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1904-01-05· cited 11×
- Gaston v. BaileyIndiana Court of Appeals· 1896-03-11· cited 6×
- Mercier v. Travelers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 1901-03-01· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.