Skip to main content
· 3/9/1910

Campbell v. Fourth Nat. Bank

Citations

  • 137 Ky. 555
  • 126 S.W. 114
  • 1910 Ky. LEXIS 598

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]wo separate opportunities in two separate forums to challenge the validity of Plain- tiffs’ patent does raise a concern of an unfair tactical advantage, giving them two bites of the apple as to a central defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hobson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.