Skip to main content
· 3/18/1996

Campbell v. Federal Express Corp.

Citations

  • 918 F. Supp. 912
  • 6 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 835
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3713
  • 1996 WL 138608

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an employer is \entitled to rely on medical determinations made by its medical professionals\
  • where driver attempts to litigate his DOT qualifications in court rather than DOT, circumstances “militate strongly in favor” of application of primary jurisdiction
  • failure to satisfy DOT requirements for certification means the plaintiff was not qualified for his position under the ADA “as a matter of law”
  • “Federal Express was entitled to rely on the determinations made by its medical professionals”
  • motor carriers are entitled to rely on medical professionals’ determinations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.