Campbell v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is axiomatic that we will not disturb a[n] . . . order . . . on appeal for harmless error.”
• “It is axiomatic that we will not disturb a judgment, order, or decree on appeal for harmless error.”
• “It is axiomatic that we will not disturb a judgment, order, or decree on appeal for harmless error.” (citing Paley v. Trautman, 317 Pa. 589, 177 A. 819 (1935))
• “It is axiomatic that we will not disturb a judgment, order, or decree on appeal for harmless error. Paley v. Trautman, [177 A. 819, 820 (Pa. 1935).]”
• “It is axiomatic that we will not disturb a judgment, order, or decree on appeal for harmless error. Paley v. Trautman, [177 A. 819, 820 (Pa. 1935).]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Vine v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement Board
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-12-21· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Arenella
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-09-24· cited 17×
• Honaman v. Township of Lower Merion
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-01-31· cited 13×
• Pennsylvania Game Commission v. Bowman
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-09· cited 13×
• Lowenschuss v. Lowenschuss
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-23· cited 9×
• Samuel J. Lansberry, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-05-03· cited 7×
• Lehigh & Northampton Transportation Auth. v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 956
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-04-11

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of Pittsburgh
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-03· cited 640×
• Richmond v. Otter
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-01-03· cited 7×