Skip to main content
· 6/27/1888

Campbell v. Coburn

Citations

  • 77 Cal. 36
  • 18 P. 860
  • 1888 Cal. LEXIS 614

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing after trial court stated his favorable opinion of the witness, bolstering her credibility and thereby “influencing an issue that is solely for the jury to determine”
  • saying that a trial judge “‘should not in the hearing of the jury make any remark tending to compliment or disparage a witness’” and holding that, when the trial court stated its “high opinion” of a witness, it improperly “bolstered her credibility” (citation omitted)
  • saying that a trial judge “ ‘should not in the hearing of the jury make any remark tending to compliment or disparage a witness’ ” and holding that, when the trial court stated its “high opinion” of a witness, it improperly “bolstered her credibility” (citation omitted)
  • saying that a trial judge 6 “‘should not in the hearing of the jury make any remark tending to compliment or disparage a witness’” and holding that, when the trial court stated its “high opinion” of a witness, it improperly “bolstered her credibility” (citation omitted)
  • reversal required where trial court praised witness as pillar of community

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Searls

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.