· 6/27/1888
Campbell v. Coburn
Citations
- 77 Cal. 36
- 18 P. 860
- 1888 Cal. LEXIS 614
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing after trial court stated his favorable opinion of the witness, bolstering her credibility and thereby “influencing an issue that is solely for the jury to determine”
- saying that a trial judge “‘should not in the hearing of the jury make any remark tending to compliment or disparage a witness’” and holding that, when the trial court stated its “high opinion” of a witness, it improperly “bolstered her credibility” (citation omitted)
- saying that a trial judge “ ‘should not in the hearing of the jury make any remark tending to compliment or disparage a witness’ ” and holding that, when the trial court stated its “high opinion” of a witness, it improperly “bolstered her credibility” (citation omitted)
- saying that a trial judge 6 “‘should not in the hearing of the jury make any remark tending to compliment or disparage a witness’” and holding that, when the trial court stated its “high opinion” of a witness, it improperly “bolstered her credibility” (citation omitted)
- reversal required where trial court praised witness as pillar of community
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Searls
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.