Court of Appeals of Virginia· 4/10/2007
Campbell v. Campbell
Citations
- 49 Va. App. 498
- 642 S.E.2d 769
- 2007 Va. App. LEXIS 141
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting cross-examination “is not a privilege but an absolute right” (quoting Basham v. Terry, 199 Va. 817, 824 (1958))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Humphreys
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
- O'Loughlin v. O'LoughlinCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1996-12-31· cited 592×
- Congdon v. CongdonCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2003-04-08· cited 519×
- Wactor v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2002-05-28· cited 291×
- Estate of Hackler v. HacklerCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-09-21· cited 128×
- United States v. Francisco Curbelo, A/K/A Murando, United States of America v. Francisco Curbelo, A/K/A MurandoFourth Circuit· 2003-09-11· cited 75×
- Basham v. Terry, AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia· 1958-03-10· cited 42×
- Velocity Express Mid-Atlantic, Inc. v. HugenSupreme Court of Virginia· 2003-09-12· cited 38×
- Jackson v. WARDEN OF SUSSEX I STATE PRISONSupreme Court of Virginia· 2006-03-24· cited 14×
- Food Lion, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Virginia· 1999-02-26· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.