Campbell v. Bunting

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that personal jurisdiction existed based on correspondent banking activity when use of correspondent accounts were \part of the principal wrong at which the plaintiffs' lawsuit is directed\
• noting that it will be the rare case where minimum contacts do not exist despite the transaction of business
• observing that any such burden is eased by “the conveniences of modern communication and transportation”
• emphasizing that this conclusion is particularly appropriate where the use of a New York bank account is “recurring”
• observing that any such burden is eased by “the conveniences of modern communication and transportation”
• noting that, while “personal jurisdiction permitted under [New York’s] long-arm statute may theoretically be prohibited under due process analysis, we would expect such cases to be rare”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).