Campbell v. BNSF Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that adherence to a railroad’s safety protocols is not enough to show a contractor’s employees were railroad employees
• holding that supervision and control by railroad is entitled to great weight in considering whether railroad may be deemed plaintiffs employer
• holding that adherence to a railroad’s safety protocols is not enough to show a contractor’s employees were railroad employees
• holding that supervision and control by railroad is entitled to great weight in considering whether railroad may be deemed plaintiff’s employer
• holding that, although railroad’s hub manager admittedly oversaw contractor’s work to ensure timely completion and safety compliance, “discussions” about which tracks needed to be cleared and spotted were not sufficient to establish control
• noting that a civil conspiracy claim fails to the extent wrongful conduct is not actionable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).