· 1/8/1993
Campbell v. Black
Citations
- 844 P.2d 759
- 17 Kan. App. 2d 799
- 1993 Kan. App. LEXIS 6
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering the intent of the account holder, and other documents, in deciding whether a change in beneficiary was made, even though account holder did not comply with formal requirements of the financial institution
- noting severance by mutual agreement of the parties, by course of conduct indicating tenancy in common, or by operation of law upon destruction of one or more of the required unities [time, title, interest, and possession]
- listing severance by mutual agreement of the parties, by course of conduct indicating tenancy in common, or by operation of law upon destruction of one or more of the required unities [time, title, interest, and possession]
- ‘The authority of a conservatee to make testamentary dispositions includes the authority to change POD beneficiaries.” (citing Union Natl. Bank of Wichita v. Mayberry, 533 P.2d 1303, 1307 (Kan. 1975))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elliott, Davis, Lorentz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.