Campbell v. Beak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although trial court’s charge was erroneous “the jury’s verdict may stand because the evidence presented supports it under the correct standard”
• separation of fees between compensable and non-compensable claim was not necessary due to \the similarity of the two claims and the difficulty of separating them\
• vehicle being sold “as is” does not require different, result on question of diligence when nothing placed plaintiff on notice he was being deceived
• party seeking attorney fees proved their reasonableness where his attorney made statements to the court “that his fees were more than reasonable, given the complexity of the case, his education, and his experience”
• “[A]n attorney may testify as to the reasonableness of his 20 own fee.”
• measure of damages for FBPA claim ‘‘is that of actual injury suffered”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).