Skip to main content
· 2/23/2000

Campbell v. Baldwin

Citations

  • 90 F. Supp. 2d 754
  • 90 F. Supp. 754
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3379
  • 2000 WL 291372

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that individuals who violate subsection (b
  • “courts have been unanimous in holding that child support payments are not a ‘debt’ covered by the [FDCPA]”
  • “courts have been unanimous in holding that child support payments are not a ‘debt’ covered by the [FDCPA]”
  • plaintiff “simply cannot establish that the child support payments he allegedly owes are a ‘debt’ covered by the” FDCPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cobb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.