· 2/23/2000
Campbell v. Baldwin
Citations
- 90 F. Supp. 2d 754
- 90 F. Supp. 754
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3379
- 2000 WL 291372
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that individuals who violate subsection (b
- “courts have been unanimous in holding that child support payments are not a ‘debt’ covered by the [FDCPA]”
- “courts have been unanimous in holding that child support payments are not a ‘debt’ covered by the [FDCPA]”
- plaintiff “simply cannot establish that the child support payments he allegedly owes are a ‘debt’ covered by the” FDCPA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cobb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.