Campbell-Eley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider defendant's motion to correct illegal sentence while a direct appeal of the sentence was pending
• holding that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider defendant's motion to correct illegal sentence while a direct appeal of the sentence was pending
• a trial court lacks jurisdiction to consider a defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence while a direct appeal is pending

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Day v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-11-09· cited 12×
• Martin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-28· cited 4×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-08· cited 3×
• Major v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-25· cited 3×
• Everett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-08· cited 2×
• JOSEPH D. BALDINO v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-08-02
• Reilly v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-10-02
• Baldino v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-08-02

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Campbell-Eley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-16· cited 17×
• Campbell-Eley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-05· cited 2×