Campbell County Bank v. Schmitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiffs satisfied Rule 9(b) with the allegation “that Samsung employs a procedure whereby authorized service technicians report their calls to Samsung,” which suggested that individuals at Samsung had knowledge
• concluding that, as to the Washington statute at issue here, a plaintiff asserting a claim based on omissions did not need to plead “that he saw a communication from [the defendant] before he made his purchase[,]” but noting that he would still need to “prove causation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).