Campbell Burgess, FCCAI, LLC Burgess Chain-C Series, JHJ - Ex No. 1, LLC, JSB Estate - Ex No. 1, LLC, Chain C - Ex No. 1, LLC, Thomas - Ex No. 1, LLC v. G. R. Chapman Limited Partnership, George Chapman, and Karen Chapman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Trade-offs often concern what is feasible, not what is, on balance, desirable. Motivation to combine requires the latter.” (emphasis added)
• “[T]he law does not require that the references be combined for KINETIC CONCEPTS v. SMITH & NEPHEW 8 the reasons contemplated by the inventor.”
• \[T]he law does not require that the references be combined for the reasons contemplated by the inventor.\
• \What a reference teaches is a question of fact.\
• “As long as some motivation or suggestion to combine the references is provided by the prior art taken as a whole, the law does not require that the references be combined for the reasons contemplated by the inventor.”
• “As long as some motivation or suggestion to combine the references is provided by the prior art taken as a whole, the law does not required that the references be combined for IN RE: CONRAD 7 the reasons contemplated by the inventor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).