Skip to main content
· 5/14/2002

Federal Case

Citations

  • 290 F.3d 843
  • 52 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 751
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 9121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to extend discovery filed nine days after the close of discovery
  • stating that counsel’s representations are not evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.