Skip to main content
· 4/11/1996

Campanelli v. Regents of University of California

Citations

  • 44 Cal. App. 4th 572
  • 51 Cal. Rptr. 2d 891
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 4305
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2636
  • 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that statement need not be literally true “so long as the imputation is substantially true so as to justify the ‘gist or sting’ of the remark”
  • “Even if they are objectively unjustified or made in bad faith, publications which are statements of opinion rather than fact cannot form the basis for a libel action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.