Camp v. East Fork Ditch Co., Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a final judgment is a separate document that states on its face the relief granted or denied
• stating that a prescription claimant must show “open, notorious, continuous, and uninterrupted use, under a claim of right and with the knowledge of the owner of the servient tenement” for the prescriptive period
• considering late motion for summary judgment, noting that I.R.C.P. 16(b)(6) authorizes modification of scheduling order modified upon showing of good cause
• noting the distinction between civil and criminal contempt is important because of the federal constitutional rights the Supreme Court has held are applicable in nonsummary criminal contempt proceedings
• “Under Idaho law, however, the court in a contempt proceeding does not have the authority to order the contemnor to pay damages to the complainant”
• “The right to appeal to this Court as a matter of right is governed by the Idaho Appellate Rules.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).