Camp v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that lease provisions restricting Delta’s use of property were “reasonable for space leased in the airport terminal to an airline” and indicated a usufruct when combined with other indicia of lessor control
• explaining that the “car- dinal rule” in determining whether an agreement creates a lease- hold or an estate for years is to scrutinize the agreement “to ascer- tain what interest the parties intended to be conveyed or demised by it”
• finding the use restrictions in a thirty-year lease were incompatible with an estate for years and rebutted the presumption that the lease created an estate for years
• finding the use restrictions in a 30-year lease were incompatible with an estate for years and rebutted the presumption that the lease created an estate for years
• finding the use restrictions in a 30- year lease were incompatible with an estate for years and rebutted 25 the presumption that the lease created an estate for years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).