CAMP Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. City of Atlanta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that CAMP could challenge “only provisions of the Festivals Ordinance that affect its activities”
• holding that an organiza- tion can challenge only those provisions of an ordinance that are related to its activities
• holding that the plaintiff only had standing to challenge provisions of an ordinance that actually affected it or under which it suffered a demonstrable injury
• concluding that an organization lacked standing to challenge a provision where it “failed to present evidence that it has, or imminently will be, denied a permit”
• noting that “[t]he overbreadth doctrine does not relieve a plaintiff of the burden to prove constitutional standing”
• noting that a plaintiff may challenge only those provisions of an ordinance that “affect its activities”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).