Skip to main content
· 8/2/2000

Cammarata v. Jones

Citations

  • 763 So. 2d 552
  • 2000 WL 1060398

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding disqualification was required because the judge “suggest[ed] to [plaintiff’s] counsel alternatives on how to proceed strategically”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.