· 9/15/1970
Cammack v. State
Citations
- 261 N.E.2d 862
- 254 Ind. 637
- 1970 Ind. LEXIS 590
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that “without an argument section in appellant’s brief, there is in reality no appeal,” and that the requirement that appellant present a cogent argument is not met by inclusion of a summary of the argument that does not include citation to relevant supporting authorities
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.