Camfield v. City of Oklahoma City

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that amendments to a law rendered the appeal moot, despite the appellant's constitutional challenge to the new version, because the amendments eliminated the statutory basis for the challenge that had been brought in district court
• noting that five acts ordinarily are insufficient to establish a habit under F. R. Evid. 406
• describing a habit as “a regular practice of meeting a particular situation with a specific type of conduct, . . . [which] may become semiautomatic.”
• addressing the constitutionality of authorities’ seizure of a film that they believed contained child pornography
• six incidents of conduct during seizure of child pornography was not enough to establish the existence of a habit
• “[I]t is well settled in this circuit that courts have inherent equitable authority to order the expungement of an arrest record or a conviction in rare or extreme circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).