C.A.M.F. v. J.B.M.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a party can- not be released from liability for injuries resulting from its future negligence in the absence of language that expressly invokes negligence
• concluding that a party can- not be released from liability for injuries resulting from its future negligence in the absence of language that expressly invokes negligence
• requiring the use of the word “negligence” in a release pertaining to snowtubing
• requiring the use of the word “negligence” in a release pertaining to snowtubing
• “we do not reach the issue of whether a well drafted agreement purporting to have such an effect would be enforceable”
• “[T]he ... rule is that a party cannot be released from liability for injuries resulting from its future negligence in the absence of language that expressly so provides”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).