Cameron Whitworth v. State of Arkansas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that § 1326(d) codified United States v. Mendoza–Lopez, 481 U.S. 828 (1987), “which established due process requirements for the application of § 1326”
• holding deportation proceedings did not deprive alien of right to judicial review because he failed to appeal deportation order “to the BIA and, if unsuccessful there, to a court of appeals”
• refusing to entertain a collateral attack because “[a] subsequent change in the law does not render [the defendant’s] waiver of his right to appeal ‘not considered or intelligent’”
• “Actual prejudice exists where defects in the deportation proceedings ‘may well have resulted in a deportation that would not otherwise have occurred.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).