Skip to main content
· 2/7/1992

Cameron v. Hughes

Citations

  • 825 P.2d 882
  • 1992 Alas. LEXIS 13
  • 1992 WL 19712

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that superior court's interpretation of appellate rule is reviewed de novo
  • holding interpretation of appellate 15 . Jacob v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Office of Children's Servs., 177 P.3d 1181, 1184 (Alaska 2008) (quoting Guin v. Ha, 591 P.2d 1281, 1284 n. 6 (Alaska 1979)
  • applying de novo standard of review to trial court’s interpretation of appellate rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Burke, Matthews, Compton, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.