Cameron v. Hardisty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that when a diversity case is filed in federal court in Iowa, the court must apply Iowa choice-of-law rules
• noting that when a diversity case is filed in federal court in Iowa, the court must apply Iowa choice-of-law rules
• finding that Iowa law, instead of Nebraska law, controlled in automobile accident negligence case because Nebraska was merely the place of accident and none of the parties resided in Nebraska
• finding that the Iowa statute of repose applied rather than Nebraska law in an automobile accident negligence case because Nebraska was merely the place of impact and none of the parties resided in Nebraska
• finding that the Iowa statute of repose applied rather than Nebraska law in an automobile accident negligence case because Nebraska was merely the place of impact and none of the parties resided in Nebraska
• declining to overrule prior cases in response to certified question where “no reason, factually or legally, to depart from the rule expressed in our prior decisions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).