Cameron v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a police officer can initiate prosecution by filing charges or other accusatory instruments
• stating that setting aside jury verdict under Rule 50(b) appropriate only if reasonable jury would not have legally sufficient evidentiary basis to find for non-movant on that issue
• noting that there was “nothing improper in [a prosecutor] testifying about [their] interactions with [arresting officers] insofar as they allow the jury to draw appropriate inferences one way or another as to the officers’ malice”
• explaining that “witnesses may not present testimony in the form of legal conclusions”
• noting .that a police officer can initiate prosecution by filing charges or other accusatory instruments
• outlining elements of OGA violation, finding that effectuating an arrest is an official function

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).