Cameron v. Bd. of Educ. of Hillsboro, Ohio Sch. D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employee did not have a claim for wrongful discharge, because defendants did not discharge her but rather did not renew her contract
• “Where a claimant in a Title VII case does not have an attorney, courts are required to give a broad reading of the charge before the EEOC.”
• plaintiffs only basis for emotional distress claim, that she “may have been dismissed for discriminatory reasons” was insufficient to establish claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).