Cameron v. Bartels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defining a necessary party as any with “a present, substantial interest in the matter being litigated, and in whose absence a complete resolution of the matter in controversy [could not] be achieved”
• one joint owner could not bind his co-owner to a timber deed without her consent
• one joint owner could not bind his co-owner to a timber deed without her consent
• “An injunction may lie to protect a landowner or a person in possession of real estate.”
• “an injunction will lie to restrain acts of trespass to real property, which are continuous or constantly recurring, where irreparable injury will result unless they are restrained”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).