Cameron McPherson v. Brian David Rudman, M.D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that there are “many examples of Congress legislating in [a] hyper-vigilant way, to ‘remov[e] any doubt’ as to things not particularly doubtful in the first instance” (citation omitted)
• finding that \the 'first filed' rule must have some vitality in a post-Cyan world\
• explaining that “Congress passed the [PSLRA] principally to stem ‘perceived abuses of the class-action vehicle in litigation involving nationally traded securities,” and passed SLUSA “[t]o prevent plaintiffs from circumventing the [PSLRA]”
• observing that Congress enacted SLUSA \[t]o prevent plaintiffs from circumventing the [PSLRA] ....\
• explaining that the Federal Jurisdiction Statute “completely disallows (in both state and federal courts) sizable class actions that are founded on state law and allege dishonest practices respecting a nationally traded security’s purchase or sale”
• observing that SLUSA contains a \broad definition of 'covered class action' ....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).